J.B. Van Hollen
Scott Jensen jury selection hits a snag
Jury selection began today in the retrial of former Assembly Speaker Scott Jensen, a mere eight years after he was charged with felony misconduct in office, and four years after he was convicted of three felonies and sentenced to 15 months in prison, of which he has not served a day.*
The case could be delayed further, however, by difficulties finding a jury of 12 of Jensen's peers to serve on the panel.
"We were thinking we could empanel a jury of Chuck Chvala, Brian Burke, Steve Foti,and some other former legislators who were convicted of similar crimes, but Jensen's lawyers objected because those people actually paid some penalties, including fines and jail time, for what they did," a Waukesha prosecutor said. "It's going to be hard to find 12 people who did the kinds of things Jensen did and got off scot free."
There They Go Again
Salon Looks at 1960s Civil Rights Movement
Today's Republican Party, like Wisconsin attorney general J.B. Van Hollen, and know-nothing GOP bloggers still don't get why so many were incensed by last year's voter suppression efforts. It's likely that they never will.
Today Is a Good Day for Freedom
Today, Americans are reinvested with hope that our government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.
Liberty, privacy, the Bill of Rights: we now have a president who actually believes in these demands and rights of the people.
How strongly Obama acts, and how intently he repudiates through action the ideology of America's worst presidency is the measure of our success for the next four years.
Wisconsin '08 Election Notes
Typical among today's brand of Republican commentators, such admissions have not been forthcoming.
White Working Class
Newest Fool on Voter Suppression Case: Wigderson
GOP Writers: Reading Is Bad on Voter Suppression Case
Seeing the reaction to the news that the GAB is considering a timetable of its maintenance of its statewide registered voter list (SVRS), one is left with the impression that desire for rightwingers to read before commenting constitutes a lost hope. Hyperbole? I wish.
Regarding the Van Hollen v. Government Accountability Board case, one would believe that those rightwing writers dissing the decision would read the briefs, relevant sections of the HAVA statute and the text of Judge Sumi's decision to dismiss. Sumi’s decision is 22 pages-long and is a quick read.
But rightwingers, like Dad29, show a stubborn resistance to facts. Hey, they were right all along, Dad29 would have you believe.
Rightwingers Set to Mock Themselves
A valuable bequest from the Clinton administration is the revealing to a wide political audience of the American rightwing as hateful whack jobs. Decent, hard-working people no doubt, but whack jobs nonetheless who pursued the Clintons relentlessly and shamelessly, casting every aspersion imaginable upon a cautious administration.
As a result of the Clintons' devastating rebuttal of the rightwing attacks [at the height of the impeachment, Bill Clinton's approval numbers rose to 69 percent], George W. Bush was forced to run as an anti-rightwing, centrist Republican, proclaiming non-divisive moderation in the 2000 election.
Progressive groups like Move On flowered as the attacks on Clinton became utterly untenable and the American people soured on the politics of the right.
Dane County Black Man: "I will be voting today."
Keep up the heat till closing time.
"I will be voting today," he said calmly but with determination.
Black folks who were newly registering at the polls had a determined look in their eyes; I mean it. And there was a steady stream of black families coming from the newly-registered room.
I lived in the ward for some eight years and I know the high and low-turnout areas. Many voting today were from low turn-out areas.
Inspiring. These are just the people that J.B. Van Hollen and the Republicans want to disenfranchise. And they would not be stopped today.
Van Hollen to initiate emergency election proceedings?
I'm not sure what this means, and neither does Governor Doyle, nor Chief Judge Sue Bischel of Green Bay, so I'm in good company.
What could Wisconsin Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen have up his sleeve when he calls for "voter checks" on election day because the state may have to "initiate emergency, election-related proceedings."
Could this have something to do with the actions of the law enforcement personnel he's sending to the polls?
Bring Cell Phones to Fight DOJ Asst AGs and Special Agents
RFK and Palast on GOP's National Vote-stealing Program
In the current issue of Rolling Stone, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. & Greg Palast report on the national vote-suppressing program of which Van Hollen is just one sleazy operative. Check it out.
In state after state, Republican operatives — the party's elite commandos of bare-knuckle politics — are wielding new federal legislation to systematically disenfranchise Democrats. If this year's race is as close as the past two elections, the GOP's nationwide campaign could be large enough to determine the presidency in November.
On CNN, Van Hollen Admits to GOP Lawsuit Collusion
From the Wisconsin Democratic Party:
Van Hollen says GOP 'may have asked lawyers in my office to file the lawsuit.'
In a recent interview with CNN, Attorney General JB Van Hollen finally admitted to what we’ve known all along, that his hyper-partisan lawsuit against the GAB was brought in collusion with his Republican Party bosses.
Van Hollen doesn’t have a very good poker face. Watch his eyes wandering nervously when the reporter presses him on whether or not the GOP personally asked him to file the lawsuit. Maybe he’s nervous because he lost his lawsuit and now his web of cover-ups and deceit at the DOJ is finally unraveling.
Remember, this is the same guy who made the following statements to reporters last month:

Recent comments
1 day 12 hours ago
2 days 4 hours ago
3 days 2 hours ago
3 days 2 hours ago
3 days 5 hours ago
4 days 5 hours ago
4 days 5 hours ago
5 days 5 hours ago
5 days 10 hours ago
5 days 11 hours ago