Profuse apologies to John Lennon. But that refrain was in my brain after reading Tom Still's plea that Wisconsin consider nuclear power. "What do we have to lose?" he asks. (More on that later)
Still, president of something called the Wisconsin Technology Council, thinks it's a crying shame that Wisconsin has a moratorium law on the books that won't allow the state to even consider nuclear power as an option.
It will come as a surprise to many -- but not, I suspect, to Tom Still -- to learn that there is no nuclear "moratorium" in effect that bans more nuclear power plants in the state.
What is on the books is a perfectly reasonable law that says if you want to build a new reactor here, there are two requirements that must be met first:
(1) There must be a federal site to dispose of the dangerous, high level radioactive waste the reactors produce, and
(2) The Public Service Commission must find that nuclear power makes economic sense.
That's no ban or moratorium. It merely sets some reasonable requirements. But since the law was passed in 1984 the nuclear industry has not been able to meet those tests. So now it wants to relax the law.
It has been more than 50 years since the US began generating nuclear power -- and nuclear waste.