Ryan gets a free ride on his ridiculous road map
Erik Gunn of Milwaukee Magazine asks in his Pressroom Buzz column whether the Wisconsin media will do any serious critique of Rep. Paul Ryan
's "Roadmap for America's Future."
The Economist, published in London, actually has commented on the content of Ryan's proposal, rather than simply writing about how much attention Ryan's getting or wondering whether he is running for president, which is about the depth the Wisconsin media has reached.
The Economist article is devastating. "It's easy to bring down medical costs," it says. "Just stop paying them."
That is what Ryan proposes to do:
Mr Ryan has put forward a serious proposal for shrinking medical-cost inflation and hence shrinking the long-term federal budget deficit. It does so by ending America's provision of first-rate health care to all seniors. Rich seniors will still be able to afford high-quality medical care. Poor seniors won't. They will suffer more and die younger. A different approach to solving America's health-care cost problem might involve letting Medicare use its vast bargaining power to negotiate lower rates with the providers of pharmaceuticals; establishing a commission of experts (MedPAC) to rate the effectiveness of medical procedures, to avoid wasteful incentives in the current fee-for-services medical model; and establishing bundled payments for disease management, to achieve Mayo-Clinic-like efficiencies in care while improving quality. Those are the models proposed in the Democratic bills currently in Congress. But they're really complicated and hard to understand—they make for a bill that's 2,000 pages long. And everybody knows the American people hate that. Mr Ryan proposes to simply slash Medicare spending and balance the budget on the backs of poor seniors. That'll work too.
Gee, why don't we ever hear that kind of analysis about the Wisconsin Whiz Kid's great ideas in Wisconsin? Is anybody out there?

Comments
Ryan's Roadmap
Isn't forcing doctors to accept lower payments simply another way of "not paying for health care"?
Regardless, hasn't history shown that there simply isn't the will in Congress to force doctors to accept lower payments. I believe the Senate is considering yet another "doc fix" as part of their jobs bill right now.
Ryan is concerned about the
Ryan is concerned about the deficit?
How did he vote on the Iraq War?
How did he vote on the Bush tax cuts?
Any politician (Democrats and Republicans alike)who supported the Iraq War and the Bush tax cuts are not credible on the deficit issue.
re my piece referred to
re my piece referred to above, to get the link you have to use the quote marks as i wrote them. thus, "ryan's road map lacks fiscal details." also road map, two words.
Or
Just go to http://wisopinion.com/index.iml?mdl=article.mdl&article=14473
Steve Hanson
Uppity Wisconsin
for the record, i analysed
for the record, i analysed and criticised ryan's road map in a piece posted on wispolitics website on may 30, 2008, nine days after the congressman promulgated his "plan" in a wall street journal op-ed. i examined the constituent parts of ryan's plan. i didn't, and still don't, care about its philosophy. to read my piece, google the words "ryan's road map lacks fiscal details." then click on the wisopinion link.
It's a good piece
I wish it had appeared in the Milwaukee Sentinel, your old employer.
My point is that most of the commentary has been limited to the web and very little except superficial "Isn't it great that a Wisconsin boy got on national TV?" coverage has appeared in the mainstream media.
Why anyone would listen to an
Why anyone would listen to an economist or reporter from the U.K. is amazing. Considering they have the worst health care in the world like Canada.
Ryan is typical politician
Shrink the nation's debt by cutting off the giveaways to the special interests that fund congressional elections!!! There are only two possible reasons why our country is in a tailspin: either our politicians are inept or they are corrupt, and there’s little indication of it being the former.
Post new comment