Uppity Wisconsin

He asked personnel for a fork lift and operator, which were sent with him.

Personnel positioned the fork lift under the rear edge of the plane, under a beam inside the plane and tried to use it as jacking point to life the plane off of Holland.

Roberts told the fork lift operator to raise the forks, but they were ordered to stop by an officer who said they would damage the C-54 airplane.

Roberts became upset at the order and for decades told the story of the death of Holland in anger, saying the officer believed a possible dent in the aircraft was more important than the life of Holland.

US Atty Stephen Biskupic’s office said in a Nov. 13, 2006 press release that “Roberts falsified his role in the attempted rescue of an airman killed at Naval Air Facility Naples on February 4, 1969.”

E-mail

The naval officer and aviator who wrote the e-mail was present at and witnessed the incident.

But he was not interviewed by military personnel investigating the accident in 1969, by VA Special Agent Ray Vasil of the Inspector General’s office in Chicago in 2005-2006, by the US Atty’s office, nor was he a witness at Roberts’ trial.

The naval officer’s e-mail reads in part:

“I was at NAF Naples from June 1968-71. … I think the c-54 which had the nose wheel accident was a commander middle east forces bird which was at Naples for scheduled maintenance at the time. I remember the accident. I don’t think anyone there at the time would forget it. As I recall someone had used a screwdriver instead of the proper pin to lock the nosewheel. The maintenance officer was Lcdr Hal (Harold) Truesdale. I recall that he stopped someone from using a forklift to quickly raise the nose of the aircraft, as he said it would damage the aircraft and instead opted for having people run to the aft end of the aircraft in order to take the weight off the nose and recover the airman trapped. I am pretty sure the man died as a result of the injuries.”

The naval officer’s e-mail supports Roberts’ version of event of the attempted use of a fork lift and the order by an officer to stop using the forklift.

Testimony by a naval officer on the substance of the e-mail would have likely engendered in a jury at the least reasonable doubt that Roberts lied about his role.

Roberts and the VA

Roberts was advised in 2002 by the late Jim Henning, a Shawano County (Wisconsin) Veteran's Service Officer, to apply for an earlier retroactive date for his PTSD disability benefits predicated in part by his witnessing Holland being crushed to death and related trauma.

Critics and veteran groups accuse the Bush administration of the unprecedented politicalization of the Department of Justice and the VA, and see the indictment and conviction of Roberts on charges of wire fraud (and other veterans) as a consequence of this politicalization that discourages Vietnam-era veterans from seeking PTSD benefits, per the views of the American Enterprise Institute.

Roberts was diagnosed with PTSD and granted disability benefits in 1999, but became suspicious of the VA and he accused the VA of engaging in fraud.

Ultimately, the VA and US Atty Stephen Biskupic turned Roberts' charge around, and charged and convicted Roberts with fraud, a prosecution that has veterans all over the country shaking their heads in disbelief.

Next Legal Steps

Roberts is appealing his conviction.

Roberts' appeal brief is due June 29 before the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

The government brief is due July 30.

Roberts' reply brief is due August 13.

Oral arguments are scheduled at the Court's convenience.

The case number is: U.S. v. Roberts, E.D. of Wisconsin federal court, docket 05-CR-118. U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, 07-1546,

###